The Wall Street Journal published an article this week detailing how its inquiries prompted the resignation of Mazen Asbahi, a Chicago lawyer who had just been appointed volunteer national coordinator for Arab American and Muslim American affairs for Barack Obama’s campaign.
The Journal had inquired about Asbahi’s brief stint eight years ago on the board of an investment fund. Asbahi served on the board for a “few weeks” and resigned when he became aware of allegations made against another board member. Yet the Wall Street Journal’s article suggests that Asbahi is guilty-but guilty of what?
The Wall Street journal article also states that Asbahi “is a frequent speaker before several groups in the U.S. that scholars have associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.” However, the article fails to name a group or scholars that are assessing them as being associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
It states that questions about Asbahi first arose in a web-based publication called the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report, but gives no information about who publishes it or what their agenda might be.
Surely a newspaper with the standards of the Wall Street Journal can better inform the reading public before making and repeating such specious claims. This is a clear case of unwarranted character assassination, and the Wall Street Journal should be ashamed to lend credibility to such efforts.
The full article can be read here.
Newspapers take letters to the editor seriously and will be less likely to print such stories in the future if readers make clear that they expect a higher standard.
Take action! Write to the Wall Street Journal and tell them:
- The allegations in the Wall Street Journal’s August 6 article “Obama’s Muslim-Outreach Adviser Resigns” are vague and specious. It asserts that Mazen Asbahi is a frequent speaker before groups in the U.S. that “scholars” have deemed questionable. What are the groups? When were the speeches? Who are the scholars? When you make such a serious charge, don’t you think you owe it to your readers to provide proof?
- The Wall Street Journal acknowledges that the first publication to break this “story” was the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report, an obscure website published by a think tank whose name the Journal does not reveal. Do your job, Wall Street Journal; verify your sources, support your reporting with hard facts. Stop publishing rumor and innuendo, written by bloggers, as news.
- On his involvement as a board member of an investment fund, Asbahi writes: “I served on that board for only a few weeks before resigning as soon as I became aware of public allegations against another member of the board.” How did this become a story? His explanation speaks for itself, but rather than give up its scoop, the WSJ then goes on to detail the allegations against the board member. Is guilt by association the standard of the Wall Street Journal?
- Have we come to a point in our history when any allegation of extremism against an Arab or Muslim American-however specious or vaguely-sourced-warrants uncritical news coverage? This is unacceptable and un-American. The allegations against Mr. Asbahi are a continuation of a concerted effort by individuals hostile to the Arab and Muslim American communities to exclude them from civic and political life. Far from being proud of the role that it played in Mr. Asbahi’s resignation, the Wall Street Journal should be ashamed.
Please keep your letters short, to the point, and, at all times, respectful. Try to keep your letter under 150 words. (You could, for example, use any one of the above points and add a sentence or two of your own.)
Send your letters to the following:
Tim Lemmer, the letters editor, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com.
Gerard Seib, Executive Washington editor, jerry.seib@wsj.com
Reporters Glenn Simpson at glenn.simpson@wsj.com and Amy Chozick at amy.chozick@wsj.com
Please send AAI your letters, as well: communications@aaiusa.org
Thank you for making your voice heard.
Recent Comments